Home / / Protection order breach

Protection order breach

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #471
      JS
      Participant

      I made a private application for a protection, which was granted after the respondent failed to appear three times in a row. There was one additional condition on this order, which was a ‘no contact’ condition. This was breached when the respondent used a psuedo lawyer to call me personally after failing to get a response from my solicitor. He claimed to be a forensic examiner of the courts and wanted to discuss my car. He also sent my solicitor documents claiming he was a judge and so forth. I reported these instances to the police, their investigation comprised one phone call to the so-called judge and an attempt to contact the respondent…

      Their findings are as follows:
      “Police followed up with the respondents legal representative who stated the respondent did not request him to directly contact the aggrieved. He contacted the aggrieved directly via email to get further information in relation to a property settlement. The aggrieve is alleging the respondent legal representative is not an actual lawyer. Police attached the legal representative qualification to occurrence. The respondent did not wish to answer any questions. The matter will be finalised as a unsubstituted breach as the respondent did not ask the legal representative to contact the aggrieved directly”

      I attempted to discuss the matter with the police and was told I should seek legal advice or contact the vulnerable persons unit (no answer). These people are more interested in raising revenue by catching people speeding than by upholding the law. What’s wrong with Australia? What options do I have other than make a complaint to the police, which they will investigate themselves, probably to the same standard as the investigation that I am complaining about.

    • #472
      Felix Spencher
      Keymaster

      Hi JS,

      Sorry to hear about your misfortune. Sounds like the police could/should have done a lot more.

      I think your best option is to both, wait for the next hearing and raise it with the court then, and in the meantime get some good inexpensive representation and/or legal advice.

      I can help you with the latter.

      Just drop me a line at either [email protected] or [email protected] and be sure to notify me here in this thread that you have done so, so I don’t forget.

      Good luck and kind regards,

      Felix.

    • #473
      JS
      Participant

      Hi Felix

      Thanks for reading my post, I have contacted you via email and look forward to hearing from you.

      Cheers
      JS

      • #479
        Felix Spencher
        Keymaster

        Hey JS,

        I just thought I’d let you know I haven’t seen any email from you yet. Which account did you send it to?.

        Cheers,

        Felix

    • #478
      Felix Spencher
      Keymaster

      Hey JS,

      I just thought I’d chime in and see how your case is going.

      Cheers,

      Felix

    • #480
      JS
      Participant

      Hi Felix

      Thanks for chatting this up, I made a formal complaint to the police about their failure to investigate the matter and was rebuffed. I have concentrated on finalizing my property matter and have received affidavits from the respondent that are blatant perjury.

      JS

      • #490
        Felix Spencher
        Keymaster

        Hey JS,

        No problems.

        Doesn’t sound like you’re happy about the way your case is being managed?

        Are you happy about the way you’re case is being run?.

        Did you send in your email to me as per a couple of email/posts back here when you said you would? I looked for it but couldn’t find it,

        If you send your information in quickly I can get someone here (probably Joel as he has expertise in property division and matters of separation) to have a first glance look at for you from free; a free advice 1st consultation so to speak? And you only get one get 1 chance to get it right in court.

        Only last week Joel managed to get the female ex-partner of a wealthy man’s spousal maintenance claim of ~4220K (they have a young girl and a probably a need for some maintenance but nothing like what she filed for plus she filed her spousal maintenance claim as an act of vindication because her property and parenting cases were not going as well either, well, certainly not as good as they usually do for women crying about every possible thing under the sun to get at their X’s money when they separate) down to absolutely nothing despite the client pulling in about $420K/year. She stormed out of the court room when the decision was announced as the case looked like she would get (at least some of) what she wanted – so certain of success was she that she had apparently already put the deposit down on a new luxury car.

        Cheers,

        Felix

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.